Dates in Excel spreadsheetsΒΆ

In reality, there are no such things. What you have are floating point numbers and pious hope. There are several problems with Excel dates:

  1. Dates are not stored as a separate data type; they are stored as floating point numbers and you have to rely on:

    • the “number format” applied to them in Excel and/or
    • knowing which cells are supposed to have dates in them.

    This module helps with the former by inspecting the format that has been applied to each number cell; if it appears to be a date format, the cell is classified as a date rather than a number.

    Feedback on this feature, especially from non-English-speaking locales, would be appreciated.

  2. Excel for Windows stores dates by default as the number of days (or fraction thereof) since 1899-12-31T00:00:00. Excel for Macintosh uses a default start date of 1904-01-01T00:00:00.

    The date system can be changed in Excel on a per-workbook basis (for example: Tools -> Options -> Calculation, tick the “1904 date system” box). This is of course a bad idea if there are already dates in the workbook. There is no good reason to change it even if there are no dates in the workbook.

    Which date system is in use is recorded in the workbook. A workbook transported from Windows to Macintosh (or vice versa) will work correctly with the host Excel.

    When using this package’s xldate_as_tuple() function to convert numbers from a workbook, you must use the datemode attribute of the Book object. If you guess, or make a judgement depending on where you believe the workbook was created, you run the risk of being 1462 days out of kilter.

    Reference: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/180162/xl-the-1900-date-system-vs.-the-1904-date-system

  3. The Excel implementation of the Windows-default 1900-based date system works on the incorrect premise that 1900 was a leap year. It interprets the number 60 as meaning 1900-02-29, which is not a valid date.

    Consequently, any number less than 61 is ambiguous. For example, is 59 the result of 1900-02-28 entered directly, or is it 1900-03-01 minus 2 days?

    The OpenOffice.org Calc program “corrects” the Microsoft problem; entering 1900-02-27 causes the number 59 to be stored. Save as an XLS file, then open the file with Excel and you’ll see 1900-02-28 displayed.

    Reference: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/214326/excel-incorrectly-assumes-that-the-year-1900-is-a-leap-year

  4. The Macintosh-default 1904-based date system counts 1904-01-02 as day 1 and 1904-01-01 as day zero. Thus any number such that (0.0 <= number < 1.0) is ambiguous. Is 0.625 a time of day (15:00:00), independent of the calendar, or should it be interpreted as an instant on a particular day (1904-01-01T15:00:00)?

    The functions in xldate take the view that such a number is a calendar-independent time of day (like Python’s datetime.time type) for both date systems. This is consistent with more recent Microsoft documentation. For example, the help file for Excel 2002, which says that the first day in the 1904 date system is 1904-01-02.

  5. Usage of the Excel DATE() function may leave strange dates in a spreadsheet. Quoting the help file in respect of the 1900 date system:

    If year is between 0 (zero) and 1899 (inclusive),
    Excel adds that value to 1900 to calculate the year.
    For example, DATE(108,1,2) returns January 2, 2008 (1900+108).
    

    This gimmick, semi-defensible only for arguments up to 99 and only in the pre-Y2K-awareness era, means that DATE(1899, 12, 31) is interpreted as 3799-12-31.

    For further information, please refer to the documentation for the functions in xldate.